If you haven’t yet heard about the book The Shack, you will. Written by a man named William Young, the book is making all sorts of waves, both in Christian and non-Christian circles. For the last several months it’s been hanging around the best seller charts, and it has people talking about how it has transformed their relationship with God. This weekend I decided to grab a copy of The Shack and see what all the hype was about. After reading the book I came away with two conclusions. I believe that William Young was a well intentioned guy who was trying to help people understand God better, and I don’t doubt that some people have been affected by the book. However, the book is full of blatant heresy and really does misrepresent the God of the Bible.
I’m not going to do a full review of the book here. That has already been done very well by Tim Challies. Read Tim’s review. It’s very helpful. I do want to highlight just a few reasons why The Shack is so deceptive. My hope is that when you read the book you’ll be able to think biblically about what’s written.
Intimacy vs. Holiness
Young depicts God the Father as a large, bubbly, Africa-American woman named ‘Papa’ who is always eager to give you a hug and a freshly baked scone, and who wants nothing other than to be in a loving relationship with you. Portraying God the Father at all, let alone as a woman, presents massive theological problems. But there’s something else wrong with Young’s picture of God: it’s all intimacy and no holiness. The theme that runs throughout both the Old and New Testament is that God is completely and totally holy. When Isaiah caught a glimpse of God in the temple he fell on his face and called curses down upon himself. When the apostle John saw the risen Jesus he fell on the ground as though he was dead. Because he is holy and just, God must punish sin. And yet at one point in the book ‘Papa’ says:
I don’t need to punish people for sin. Sin is its own punishment, devouring you from the inside. It’s not my purpose to punish it; it’s my joy to cure it.
The picture of an intimate, loving God who never punishes sin is an appealing one. But the glory of the gospel is that God is both intimate and holy. On the cross God did punish sin, so that he could show mercy to wicked sinners like me. Now I can call God, the holy one, ‘Father’. That’s the beauty of the gospel, and it’s clearly lacking in The Shack.
Rules vs. Relationship
Throughout the book Young creates a false dilemma between the rules of God and a relationship with God. For example, Sarayu, who represents the Holy Spirit, says at one point:
The Bible doesn’t teach you to follow rules. It is a picture of Jesus.
Well, yes and no. The Bible is all about Jesus, that much is true. But part of following Jesus is making every effort to obey him, empowered by the Spirit and in light of the gospel. 1 John 5:2-3 says:
By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God and obey his commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments. And his commandments are not burdensome.
The Bible never drives a wedge between obedience to Jesus and a relationship with Jesus. Psalm 119 is a beautiful testimony to the freedom that comes from obeying the laws of God. Yet the theme of freedom versus rules is repeated over and over again in The Shack.
TO BE CONTINUED…

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }
Al Mohler explains the error in dismissing God’s holiness in Together for the Gospel 2008 Session VI: “Why Do They Hate It So? The Doctrine of Substitution.”
Thanks for the link Ian!
One of the things that most distresses me about this book is Eugene Peterson’s endorsement. He compares this book to “Pilgrim’s Progress”. Kinda makes me wonder if/how long ago he read “Pilgrim’s Progress” …
BTW, this book has 600 5-star reviews on Amazon as I write. Oy.
Amos 8 speaks of a famine for the Word of God. With the popularity of books such as “Shack” is appears that the famine is upon us.
Tim – I agree, the Peterson endorsement is disturbing. We really need good fiction that’s rooted in sound doctrine.
I’ve vicariously been following the hype of this book via Boundless. After doing my own research I agree with the two things you presented. Those are two critical ways that the gospel has been undermined in this book.
I must be dreaming
The Shack compairs to Pilgrim’s Progress???
listen to Jan Markell’s 2 hour show (AUG 16) you can download it on mp3. I agree with her; this is nothing more then recreating God so He’s made in our (corruptible) image. Read Romans 1. Powerful stuff. watch and See Opera Eat this book up! I’ll hold on to the ‘rugged old cross’ thank you very much!
I am stricken with grief at how easily so called Christians are deceived. Pastors and lay people alike. When He returns will faith be found?
When I read the part about sin having it’s own punishment, I could barely pick up the book again to continue reading it. I read that to Tim to see what his comment would be and he said, “that’s why I won’t read the book”. Makes me love the pure truths in scripture more every day.
This book undermines so many of the fundamental truths of the Bible it’s hard to know where to begin. It does so subtly, by blending truths in with lies. Ironically it did make me crave the Bible more because I craved its depth and wisdom in comparison to this flawed and shallow book. Sad that ‘christians’ are so easily deceived by New Age philosophy disguised (fairly unconvincingly) as Christian theology. I suspect from what I know of the modern (or post-modern) church that this is down to two factors. Firstly very little knowledge of the Bible and secondly, an absolute absence of spiritual discernment. A chatty, clumsy, unholy and non-judgmental God? Call it a New Age book and be done with it.
for all you dum dums who believe you have faith let me expalin something: faith is defined as believing in something without evidence. People find evidence to believe in god in numerous things, the bible, personal experiencesm, etc. if you fit what i just said you dont have “faith” in god and if you still say you have faith in god know this: the dictionary defines stupid as unreasonabl thinking which would include beliving in something without faith. So sit down, shut up, and the Shack is an amazing book and if you cant see it sucks for you
I bought The Shack several years ago after hearing all the hype. I couldn't finish the book…it was that disturbing. The book is a thinly veiled attempt to undermine the majesty and glory of God. I'm still amazed at the number of people I respect that actually recommend the book. It's mind boggling how easily people can be led astray from the truth of scripture.
I read that book and liked very much. However there some things. There are some things that I'm not used to hearing. Jesus speaks as an ecumenical.
(Participo com a ajuda do tradutor google, perdoem possíveis erros.)
I read that book and liked very much. However there are some things that I'm not used to hearing. Jesus speaks as an ecumenical.
(Participo com a ajuda do tradutor google, perdoem possíveis erros.)